Monday, May 27, 2013

The murder on the street that shocked the nation

Last week, Briton witnessed a murder in the streets of London that shocked the entire nation.
As someone from India that was devastated by Islamic terror for centuries, I was not particularly surprised by the act that came out of the troubled side of Islam.  In this negative incident, what stood out positively to me, was the social consciousness of the Brits.

When the barbarians were on the butchering spree, there was a woman (a mother of two) who stood up to them and asked them questions. I salute her courage and social consciousness.

The British government did not hesitate to label the act as terror (it was nothing less than terror). As someone from India, I have seen the 'secular' Indian government struggling to make such bold and correct statements when faced with heinous terror strikes. 

The two barbarians responsible for the murder made 'clear statements that their Islamic faith' was behind  their motives.

The 'Muslim council of Briton' urgently made the following statement 
-   No cause justifies this murder
 -  A barbaric act that has no basis in Islam and we condemn this unreservedly
 - Vast majority of British Muslims acknowledge armed forces for the work they do
  - Calls for calm and unity in all communities.

The above statement was a positive gesture from the Muslim community.

I have seen never seen a Muslim organization disowning and condemning a Islamic terror act in India. For your information, India is the the second largest Muslim populated country in the world (after Indonesia).

The way in which the news in the west was covered was also very different from the way it would be covered in India. The news reporters were not hesitant to call 'a spade a spade'.

Anyway,  it is very unfortunate that someone walking on the street is being murdered by 2 barbarians because they had a different belief system.

Reponse to the FT Article 'India Faces a choice between tolerance and governance'



India Faces a choice between tolerance and governance - by Gurcharan Das on Financial Times Monday 27/May/2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is the letter to the Editor of Financial Times.
The author seems to the have a strong leftist (can also be read communist) background carrying a huge 'secular' luggage (an aversion for the word Hindu).  The author also tries to generalise his personal preference over an inexperienced and incompetent Rahul Gandhi, as if its a public opinion.
I come from the southern state of Tamil Nadu. BJP hardly wins any parliamentary seats in that state. Even for someone like me Modi is an obvious choice. What India needs today is an able administrator like Modi and not a inexperienced joker like Rahul.
I am even surpised how even people are even able to compare Modi with Rahul as if there is a comparison. Its like comparing the light from bright afternoon Sun with a light from hand held Torch .

The author seems to completely disconnected from the public opinion (or) desperately trying to falsify it.  The author seems to be having a obsession with the secularism. Congress has consistently damaged India by appeasing minorities in the name of Secularism.  'India is secular only because its a Hindu Nation'. Not because congress is ruling it.  If the author 'properly' reads the history of India, he will realize that the parts of India where Hindus become minority, have got separatist tendencies or even got separated from the nation.
People like us (a large number of them-sufficient enough to elect Modi as prime misiter) do not carry the same 'secular' luggage like the author and are very comfortable and even looking forward to a effective leader like Modi governing India.